In a November 15 article, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas and Richard
Wolffe repeated as fact an assertion previously made by their Newsweek colleague Jon Meacham that notwithstanding
sweeping Democratic victories in the 2006 and 2008 elections, the country
“remains right of center.” Like several media conservatives, Thomas and Wolffe cited
as evidence exit polling that showed more respondents identifying themselves as
“conservative” than as “liberal.” However, as Media
Matters for America has documented, political scientists
dispute the reliability of voters’ identification with political ideologies,
and Democracy Corps, a Democratic polling group, recently released a poll that showed
strong support for the progressive positions that President-elect Barack Obama
advocated, including the repeal of tax cuts for the wealthy and near-universal
health-care coverage. Indeed, Tod Lindberg, the former editor of The Washington
Times’ editorial page, asserted that
“the only problem” with conservatives claiming America is a
“center-right” country is that “[i]t isn’t true. Or at least,
not anymore.”
In Newsweek, Thomas
and Wolffe wrote:
If there was
any one message that defined the Obama campaign from the beginning, it was his
promise to rise above the petty politics of division and unite the country. But
now comes reality. The newly elected Congress will be left of center,
particularly the old liberal bulls that chair committees and form much of the
leadership of the House and Senate. The
country, on the other hand, remains right of center (exit polls on Election Day
show that 22 percent of voters identify themselves as liberal, 33 percent as
conservative and 46 percent as moderate). Especially in the Senate,
where the Democrats will be perhaps two or three votes shy of the 60 needed to
break a filibuster and pass a bill, compromise and coalition-building will be
the order of the day. If Obama is to accomplish much of anything, he is going
to need all the leadership skills of a Lincoln.
However, as Media Matters
noted, in the 2005
edition of American
Public Opinion*, Robert S. Erikson
and Kent L. Tedin,
political science professors at Columbia University and the University of
Houston, respectively, questioned the reliability of poll questions that ask
voters to self-identify with a political ideology. Erikson and Tedin argued
that “the most politically sophisticated segment of the public” can
more accurately identify as conservative or liberal based on traditional
ideologies. They continued: “But when less sophisticated people respond
to the ideological identification question with a response of liberal,
moderate, or conservative, we can be less sure of what the response means. At
worst, the response represents some idiosyncratic meaning known only to the
respondent, or perhaps a doorstop opinion made up on the spot. … One test is
whether the individual can both identify the Republican as the more
conservative party and offer a plausible definition of the term conservative.
Roughly half the public passes this test of understanding of ideological
labels.”
In a November 16 Washington
Post op-ed, former Washington Times editorial page editor Tod Lindberg also rebutted the claim
that self-identification polling proves that the U.S. is a center-right nation,
writing that the 2008 election results are “just the latest sign that the
country’s political center of gravity is shifting from center-right to
center-left.” Of self-identification exit polls, Lindberg wrote:
True, the percentage of voters
describing themselves as “liberal” and “conservative” has
held relatively constant over many election cycles, with self-described liberals
checking in at 22 percent this time around (up one percentage point over 2004)
and self-described conservatives at 34 percent (unchanged from 2004). The
numbers may not have changed, but the views behind those labels certainly have.
Nowadays, it’s a fair bet that most of those calling themselves
“liberal” support gay marriage.
In 1980, those same liberals were, no doubt, cutting-edge supporters of gay
rights, but the notion of same-sex marriage would have occurred only to the
most avant-garde. In 1980, having a teenage daughter who was pregnant out of
wedlock would have ruled you out for the No. 2 spot on the Democratic ticket. This year, it turned
out to be a humanizing addition to the conservative vice presidential nominee’s
résumé.
Lindberg was
identified by the Post as
“a fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution and the editor of Policy
Review. He was an informal foreign policy adviser to the McCain
campaign.”
Additionally, in
a November 10 column published
on the conservative website American Thinker, frequent contributor and attorney Steven
M. Warshawsky criticized the use of self-identification polling by Fox News
contributor Karl Rove and Democratic
strategist Doug Schoen:
One problem with
the analysis offered by Rove and Schoen is that it assumes that voters who
identify themselves as “liberal” or “moderate” or
“conservative” interpret those labels the same way that Rove and
Schoen do. And Rove and Schoen obviously believe that the “moderate”
label implies that a person is right-leaning instead of left-leaning. But is
this correct? Again, I’m skeptical. Until someone explains why supposedly
right-leaning voters flocked to Barack Obama, it seems to me that the notion
that such voters are “conservative” should be taken with more than a
grain of salt.
On the question of whether the U.S. is a
“center-right” country, Warshawsky wrote:
We won’t have a good handle on where
the country stands ideologically until we see what actually happens over the
next two years. Will the American people decide to impose higher taxes on the
“rich” to pay for the smorgasbord of social and economic benefits
that Obama and the Democrats are promising? If so, we are center-left. Will
there be a 1994-style revolt against an overreaching liberal administration? If
so, we are center-right. It is too early to say.
* Erikson, Robert S., and Kent L. Tedin. American Public
Opinion. 7th ed. New York:
Pearson Longman, 2005.



